To conclude this series on company valuation, we now explore the different quantitative methods used to value a business. Also, as a conclusion to this series of posts, we bring you some conclusions about these methods.
Company success readiness level
Venture capital
The Venture Capital (VC) method is based on the fact that investors seek to achieve a specific internal rate or return (IRR) based upon the level of risk they perceive in the venture. On average, the VCs look for returns around 25%, but the level of risk perceived by any VC could be different, so the IRR required. The VC method incorporates this understanding and uses the relevant time frame to discount a future value attributable to the company. The time frame is around 5 years, that corresponds to the investment average maturing period of VC’s portfolios. On the other hand, the future value, that corresponds to the value of the company at the exit or disinvestment moment, can be determined by different methods, including the discounting cash flow, but VCs will likely use some multiple such as price earnings ratio or EBITDA multiple.
Summarizing, the method establishes the terminal value of the company at the disinvestment time and discounts this value at the desired IRR during the expected maturing period for the investment to calculate the post-money company value. To have the pre-money value it will only be necessary to discount the investment amount:
- Terminal value = multiple x EBITDA
- Postmoney value = (Terminal value) / (1+IRR)n
- Premoney value = Postmoney value – Investment amount (premoney value is the value of the company before any investment from investors)
Where,
- “Multiple” is the average market multiple price/EBITDA
- IRR is the internal rate of return, around 25%,
- n is the number of years expected to maintain the investment, around 5.
This method establishes the value in the future based on business forecasts and then establishes the value of the company as of today discounting the value in the future with the desired rate of return considered by the VCs. This rate of return, profitability, is very high because they assume they are investing in risky businesses, so they significantly reduce the future value to get the present one.
Discounted cash flow
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) is a valuation method used to estimate the value of an investment based on its future cash flows. DCF analysis attempts to figure out the value of a company today, based on projections of how much money it will generate in the future. DCF analysis finds the present value of expected future cash flows using a discount rate.
When valuing a company, the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is used as discount rate for estimated future cash flows. WACC is the average cost the company pays for capital from borrowing or selling equity.
For companies that continue on-going beyond the time frame employed for the forecasts, there is an additional value to consider named Terminal Value. Terminal Value (TV) determines the value of a business or project beyond the forecast period when future cash flows can be estimated. This allows financial models to value a company with a greater degree of accuracy. As such, TV often comprises a large percentage of the total assessed value. This is specifically relevant in start-ups.
There are two commonly used methods to calculate terminal value: “perpetual growth” (Gordon Growth Model) and “exit multiple”. The former assumes that a business will continue to generate cash flows at a constant rate forever while the latter assumes that a business will be sold for a multiple of some market metric.
DCF model is a powerful way of valuating companies that have predictable cash flows. Normally, this is not the case for start-ups that are, in general terms, still looking for their revenue models. But the DCF model suits perfectly the case of SMEs when they have historical data and forecasts built from them.
First chicago
This method is a direct consequence of multiple DCF scenarios, 3 generally, weighted under a single exercise to get a company valuation based on their individual forecasts and probabilities of occurrence.
Real options
For example, R&D managers can use Real Options Valuation to help them deal with various uncertainties in making decisions about the allocation of resources among R&D projects.
There are different calculation procedures, the most common ones are: Black-Sholes, binomial lattices, and specialized Monte-Carlo methods. Mathematical details of these methods have relevant complexity and cannot be covered in this blog.
Book value and liquidation value
For example, R&D managers can use Real Options Valuation to help them deal with various uncertainties in making decisions about the allocation of resources among R&D projects.
There are different calculation procedures, the most common ones are: Black-Sholes, binomial lattices, and specialized Monte-Carlo methods. Mathematical details of these methods have relevant complexity and cannot be covered in this blog.